Tag Archives: Terry Brooks

The wishsong of Shannara

The wishsong of Shannara / Terry Brooks. Originally published 1985.

The wishsong of Shannara is the last book in the original Shannara trilogy and the last book by Terry Brooks that I’ll be reviewing for the foreseeable future (barring any special requests). I’ll also take this opportunity to point out that while these first three Shannara novels are frequently described as a trilogy, they don’t tell a continuous story and could just as easily be read in any order.

Brief plot description

(Spoiler free)

Brin and Jair Ohmsford are brother and sister, the children of the main characters of the previous installment in the series. Accompanied by the druid Allanon and yet another prince of Leah, the Ohmsfords are tasked with finding and destroying the Ildatch, an evil book of evil evilness.

Continue reading The wishsong of Shannara

The elfstones of Shannara

The elfstones of Shannara / Terry Brooks. Originally published 1982.

And now we’re back to epic fantasy, and Terry Brooks in particular. The elfstones of Shannara is the second book in the original Shannara trilogy, showcasing Brooks’s gradually improving writing skills and attempts to differentiate himself from Tolkein.

Brief plot description

(Spoiler-free, I guess)

Starring Will Ohmsford, the grandson of the hero of Sword of Shannara Frodo Baggins Shea Ohmsford, Elfstones of Shannara chronicles Will’s attempts to restore the magical tree that prevents demons from escaping into the world. What follows is another adventure suspiciously similar to the first book in the trilogy.

Continue reading The elfstones of Shannara

The sword of Shannara

This was actually the first edition I read
The sword of Shannara (image from Wikipedia)

The sword of Shannara / Terry Brooks. Originally published 1977.

First things first, I have to admit, this is not a great book, even if it is a significant one. The sword of Shannara was the trailblazer for the genre of “let’s re-write Lord of the rings but without the historical, linguistic, or mythological background”.

That’s not to say that the Shannara books are just Lord of the rings with different character names. There are more cosmetic differences than that. While Tolkein’s Middle Earth novels are an attempt to tell the fictional history of our world, the Shannara books take place in a post-apocalyptic future where elves and magic have returned.* I’ve been told that Brooks’s other major series, beginning with Running with the demon, bridges the gap between the present day and the world portrayed in the Shannara books.

What this slight adjustment to the setting means is that you get some ruined modern-day buildings and highways tossed into the descriptive portions from time to time.

The other thing Brooks does differently is turn the all-powerful One Ring into a sword that doesn’t really seem to do much of anything. There’s not really any point in describing the plot because for all intents and purposes it’s exactly the same as Lord of the rings.

I don’t mean to rag on this book too much – it’s really not terrible. In dropping the mythological setting of Lord of the rings, Brooks creates a book that’s a more casual read. Of course, he then half-destroys this accomplishment by making this book about twice as long as it really needs to be.

The Shannara books gradually get better as Brooks finds his own style and the world gets increasingly fleshed out. Sword of shannara is definitely the weakest in the series, so if you try it out and find it too derivative, try one of the other books before you give up on the author altogether.

The sword of Shannara is really nothing special. I read it in middle school while on a long road trip, and it was great for that. I picked up the kindle edition of the original trilogy, and it was fine for stuck-on-the-train reading.


A significant work in the genre

Lengthy but varied enough to satisfy on long trips


So derivative the word “derivative” doesn’t seem strong enough

Doesn’t really offer anything that Tolkein doesn’t


I haven’t recommended this book to anyone, mainly because anybody who I’d feel comfortable recommending it to has already read it. I did see it at a public library’s “Start a new epic fantasy series” display, and that’s really the only time I’d recommend it. It’s great for people who want to read a fun epic fantasy series and don’t care too much about anything else. Recommended for fans of the genre, others should probably stay away.

*But not in the cyberpunk Shadowrun sense. That’s a topic for another post.